﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://developers.de/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>WF - Unit Testing: Simple approach to Activity testing and improving the XOML loader.</title><link />http://developers.de/blogs/andreas_erben/archive/2007/08/01/wf-unit-testing-simple-approach-to-activity-testing-and-improving-the-xoml-loader.aspx<description>Usually I agree with Damir and his excellent posts. However, I cannot agree 100% with his post about &amp;quot; WF - Unit Testing: How to create Activity Type from XOML? &amp;quot;. When not reading it carefully, it can be misunderstood in a way that the actual</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)</generator><item><title>re: WF - Unit Testing: Simple approach to Activity testing and improving the XOML loader.</title><link />http://developers.de/blogs/andreas_erben/archive/2007/08/01/wf-unit-testing-simple-approach-to-activity-testing-and-improving-the-xoml-loader.aspx#3724<pubdate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:09:11 GMT</pubdate><guid ispermalink="false">7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:3724</guid><dc:creator>...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Lovely. Great site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3724" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: WF - Unit Testing: Simple approach to Activity testing and improving the XOML loader.</title><link />http://developers.de/blogs/andreas_erben/archive/2007/08/01/wf-unit-testing-simple-approach-to-activity-testing-and-improving-the-xoml-loader.aspx#3723<pubdate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 06:08:22 GMT</pubdate><guid ispermalink="false">7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:3723</guid><dc:creator>...</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Lovely. Great site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3723" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Few Interesting Windows Workflow Links</title><link />http://developers.de/blogs/andreas_erben/archive/2007/08/01/wf-unit-testing-simple-approach-to-activity-testing-and-improving-the-xoml-loader.aspx#1767<pubdate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:00:42 GMT</pubdate><guid ispermalink="false">7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:1767</guid><dc:creator>BusinessRx Reading List</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Igor emailed me for my thoughts about his SMTP server built with Windows Workflow . A link for the source&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1767" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>A Few Interesting Windows Workflow Links</title><link />http://developers.de/blogs/andreas_erben/archive/2007/08/01/wf-unit-testing-simple-approach-to-activity-testing-and-improving-the-xoml-loader.aspx#1765<pubdate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:53:51 GMT</pubdate><guid ispermalink="false">7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:1765</guid><dc:creator>K. Scott Allen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Igor emailed me for my thoughts about his SMTP server built with Windows Workflow. A link for the source...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=1765" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>