http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/07/28/net-frameworks-comparison-and-net3-5-sp1.aspxThe relationship of the .NET Framework versions 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5 differs from the relationship of versions 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0. The .NET Framework versions 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 are completely separate from each other, and one version can be present on a computerenCommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/07/28/net-frameworks-comparison-and-net3-5-sp1.aspx#5338Wed, 13 May 2009 01:10:31 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:5338Greg Treiss<p>hi there,</p> <p>thank you for sharing this information. I do understand that Microsoft has released the latest ASP.NET MVC Framework, which uses different technique in separating the design, code and application level and this is a better improvement than ASP.NET 3.5 SP1. I have had a chance to try both ASP.NET3.5 and ASP.NET MVC with asphostdirectory.com and I could notice some differences. </p> <p>ASP.NET MVC requires further customization on the IIS where the mapping is required. </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5338" width="1" height="1">http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/07/28/net-frameworks-comparison-and-net3-5-sp1.aspx#5334Tue, 12 May 2009 01:48:17 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:5334Websites tagged "hashing" on Postsaver<p>Pingback from &nbsp;Websites tagged &quot;hashing&quot; on Postsaver</p> <img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5334" width="1" height="1">