http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/12/27/performance-comparison-soap-vs-json-wcf-implementation.aspxAs you probably know the JSON is more compact format than SOAP, which is very usable when you want to reduce the traffic on the network. To illustrate this, assume there is a class called Airport which looks like shown below: When this class is serializedenCommunityServer 2008 SP1 (Build: 30619.63)http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/12/27/performance-comparison-soap-vs-json-wcf-implementation.aspx#191875Sat, 02 Jul 2011 19:55:51 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:191875anoynymous<p>how about compression? </p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=191875" width="1" height="1">http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/12/27/performance-comparison-soap-vs-json-wcf-implementation.aspx#12964Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:07:59 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:12964manish<p>now I am &nbsp;really confused!</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=12964" width="1" height="1">http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/12/27/performance-comparison-soap-vs-json-wcf-implementation.aspx#11842Tue, 11 May 2010 16:39:17 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:11842Shirley<p>This is hardly a valid comparison between JSON and SOAP.</p> <p>What the data really says is that WCF is even worse on JSON than it is on SOAP.</p> <p>Does making anything look this bad and/or work this poorly indicate lack of skill or questionable goals. (WCF, *not* the author)</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11842" width="1" height="1">http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/12/27/performance-comparison-soap-vs-json-wcf-implementation.aspx#10271Sun, 07 Feb 2010 08:26:07 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:10271王洋洋<p>nice,不过在我们的开发中一般与很多异构的系统交互，SOAP消息已经成为一个行业规范。</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10271" width="1" height="1">http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/12/27/performance-comparison-soap-vs-json-wcf-implementation.aspx#9527Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:43:50 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:9527geff zhang<p>浏览器安全模型规定，XMLHttpRequest、框架（frame）等只能在一个域中通信。从安全角度考虑，这个规定很合理；但是，也确实给分布式（面向服务、混搭等等本周提到的概念）Web开发带来了麻烦。...</p> <img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9527" width="1" height="1">http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/12/27/performance-comparison-soap-vs-json-wcf-implementation.aspx#5242Tue, 05 May 2009 07:47:44 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:5242Damir Dobric<p>Actually your statement is true. Personaly I think this might be changed in the near future.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5242" width="1" height="1">http://developers.de/blogs/damir_dobric/archive/2008/12/27/performance-comparison-soap-vs-json-wcf-implementation.aspx#5240Tue, 05 May 2009 04:58:54 GMT7e491611-45ad-4dae-a68f-c4cb64439510:5240AS<p>interesting- does this mean that even though Json can be lightweight - using it with WCF - its actually going to be slower ?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://developers.de/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5240" width="1" height="1">